Sudhan Gurung Calls for an End to Protest-Only Politics in Nepal

Former Home Minister and Rastriya Swatantra Party leader Sudhan Gurung says Nepal’s political culture needs a reset, arguing that opposition parties should stop treating protest as their only tool and start supporting ideas that help the country grow.

Speaking at the first district convention of the Rastriya Swatantra Party in Gorkha on Sunday, Gurung urged political forces to work together for national development instead of focusing only on criticism. His message was clear: opposition does not have to mean obstruction.

A call for cooperation

Gurung said good initiatives should be supported regardless of which party proposes them, stressing that the country benefits more when leaders cooperate on practical solutions. He framed this as a broader shift in political culture, one that moves away from permanent confrontation and toward shared responsibility.

According to the report, Gurung emphasized that all political forces should help build the country. That theme places development, not just debate, at the center of his remarks.

Why the message matters

His comments come at a time when Nepal’s politics has been shaped by intense public dissatisfaction, youth activism, and demands for cleaner governance. In that environment, Gurung’s push for constructive opposition reflects an attempt to position the Rastriya Swatantra Party as a more pragmatic force.

The speech also signals an effort to redefine what opposition politics can look like. Instead of nonstop resistance, Gurung is arguing for a model where parties challenge bad decisions while still backing reforms that serve the public interest.

What Gurung is signaling

Gurung’s remarks suggest that the next phase of politics in Nepal may be judged less by how loudly parties oppose one another and more by whether they can cooperate on governance, development, and reform. For voters frustrated with old habits, that message could carry real appeal.

At the same time, his statement puts pressure on rival parties to respond with more than slogans. If opposition leaders continue to rely only on protest, Gurung’s critique frames them as part of the problem rather than part of the solution.